From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacPherson v. MacPherson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1955
286 App. Div. 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Summary

In MacPherson v. MacPherson (286 App. Div. 991) the parties agreed — not to submit to the jurisdiction as in the present case — that either party could obtain counsel for the other who would appear on behalf of the defaulted one so as to give the court jurisdiction.

Summary of this case from Kepner v. Kepner

Opinion

September 30, 1955.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ. [ 207 Misc. 662.]


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We do not regard the order appealed from as a determination of the validity of the Mexican divorce. That is a matter to be determined upon the trial of the action. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term directing defendant to pay temporary alimony and counsel fees in an action for an absolute divorce.)


Summaries of

MacPherson v. MacPherson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1955
286 App. Div. 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

In MacPherson v. MacPherson (286 App. Div. 991) the parties agreed — not to submit to the jurisdiction as in the present case — that either party could obtain counsel for the other who would appear on behalf of the defaulted one so as to give the court jurisdiction.

Summary of this case from Kepner v. Kepner
Case details for

MacPherson v. MacPherson

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET M. MACPHERSON, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER MACPHERSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1955

Citations

286 App. Div. 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Kepner v. Kepner

In Schley v. Andrews ( 225 N.Y. 110) the benefits to be derived from the agreement were conditioned and…