From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 3, 1992
596 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-1956.

April 3, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Richard F. Conrad, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James M. Cadwell, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Gary L. Macon appeals his sentence entered after he pled to a multi-count information. He contends that the court failed to follow the plea agreement by not ordering the minimum mandatory terms for two counts to run concurrent. However, since the judge did not order the sentences to run consecutive, section 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (1991) requires that they run concurrent.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DIAMANTIS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Macon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 3, 1992
596 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Macon v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. MACON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 3, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Colon v. State

Section 921.16(1) provides that concurrent sentences must be imposed unless the trial court specifically…