Summary
reinstating the Board's grant of parole because it “was based on evaluation of objective criteria established by [MDOC] policy directives that were required by statute, and was within the range of principled outcomes,” and reversing an unpublished opinion of this Court to the contrary
Summary of this case from In re Parole of EliasOpinion
Nos. 141492 and 141494.
November 24, 2010.
Court of Appeals No. 291628.
Leave to Appeal Denied.
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we reinstate the Parole Board decision. The Parole Board did not abuse its discretion in granting parole to the defendant. The decision to grant parole was based on evaluation of objective criteria established by Michigan Department of Corrections policy directives that were required by statute, and was within the range of principled outcomes.
YOUNG, J., would grant leave to appeal.