From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macko v. Rainstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, HAYES AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for an ulnar nerve compression injury allegedly sustained by plaintiff Paul F. Macko during an emergency appendectomy performed at defendant hospital. Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although defendants met their initial burdens on the motions, the affidavit of plaintiffs' expert raises triable issues of fact with respect to defendants' negligence based upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur ( see, Kerber v. Sarles, 151 A.D.2d 1031; Hill v. Highland Hosp., 142 A.D.2d 955; see also, Ceresa v. Karakousis, 210 A.D.2d 884, 884-885).


Summaries of

Macko v. Rainstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Macko v. Rainstein

Case Details

Full title:PAUL F. MACKO AND DIANE M. MACKO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MIGUEL A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 687