From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macklin v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
May 30, 2012
No. 12-3096 (C.D. Ill. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-3096

05-30-2012

DION MACKLIN, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendant.


OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge:

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) entered by Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore on May 9, 2012, recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 1) for want of prosecution. Neither party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Thus, this Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009) ("If no party objects to the magistrate judge's action, the district judge may simply accept it.")

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 4) is ACCEPTED by this Court;

(2) Plaintiff's Complaint (d/e 4) is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FOR THE COURT:

____________

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH

UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Macklin v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
May 30, 2012
No. 12-3096 (C.D. Ill. May. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Macklin v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:DION MACKLIN, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

No. 12-3096 (C.D. Ill. May. 30, 2012)