From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackey v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 22, 1958
255 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 14239.

Argued May 5, 1958.

Decided May 22, 1958.

Mr. Theodore Baron, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Missouri, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, for petitioner. Mr. Arthur W. Scharfeld, Washington, D.C., on the brief.

Mr. James T. Brennan, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Edgar W. Holtz, Acting General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Richard A. Solomon, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Daniel M. Friedman, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondents.

Mr. Warren E. Baker, General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for respondent Federal Communications Commission.

Mr. James E. Greeley, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Richard N. Beaty, Port Chester, N.Y., and Lawrence W. Keepnews, No. Pelham, N.Y., were on the brief, for intervenor.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.


David E. Mackey, permittee of UHF Station WOCN in Atlantic City, New Jersey, petitions for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission which denied his request for rule making to amend the table of television channel assignments contained in 3.606(b) of the Rules and Regulations by shifting Channel 3 from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Atlantic City, thus making a VHF station available to the latter. He says the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and violated §§ 303(f), 303(r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 303(f, r), 307(b), §§ 4(d) and 6(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. §§ 1003(d), 1005(d), and Commission Rules 1.701, 1.702 and 1.729.

We hold the Commission acted within its discretion. Coastal Bend Television Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 251, 255, 234 F.2d 686, 690.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mackey v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
May 22, 1958
255 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Mackey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:David E. MACKEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America and Federal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: May 22, 1958

Citations

255 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
103 U.S. App. D.C. 146

Citing Cases

Rhode Island Television Corporation v. F.C.C

Appellant's request to reopen the rule making proceeding was denied by the Commission. Administrative rule…

Springfield Tel. Broad v. Federal Com. Com'n

BAZELON, Circuit Judge (concurs in the result). Mackey v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S. App.D.C. 146, 255…