From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackey v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2009
67 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-11635, 2009-04576.

November 24, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated November 19, 2008, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 602 (a) to consolidate or join for trial the instant action and an action entitled Mackey v County of Suffolk, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under index No. 28922/07, and (2) from an order of the same court dated April 8, 2009, which denied its motion for leave to reargue or renew its prior motion.

Zaklukiewicz Puzo Morrissey, LLP, Islip Terrace, N.Y. (Aileen R. Kavanagh of counsel), for appellant.

Martin Kanfer, Great Neck, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 8, 2009, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated November 19, 2008, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to consolidate the instant action and an action entitled Mackey v County of Suffolk, pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under index No. 28922/07, is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings, including amendment of the caption to reflect the consolidation; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

The appeal from the order dated April 8, 2009, must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see Williams v Beach View Apt. Corp., 57 AD3d 975), and that branch of the defendant's motion which was for leave to renew its prior motion is academic in light of our determination of the appeal from the order dated November 19, 2008.

The plaintiff commenced two separate actions against the defendant. In the first, commenced under Suffolk County index No. 32498/06, the plaintiff alleged that on September 8, 2005, she sustained serious injuries to her right hand when the doors of a bus closed on it as she was exiting. In the second, commenced under Suffolk County index No. 28922/07, the plaintiff alleged that on September 6, 2006, she again sustained serious injuries to her right hand when the doors of a bus closed on it as she was exiting. The plaintiff was treated at the same hospital and later by the same doctors after both accidents.

Under the circumstances presented here, in which no demonstrable prejudice to the plaintiff was shown, the interests of justice and judicial economy would best be served by consolidation of the actions ( see Romandetti v County of Orange, 289 AD2d 386; Donaldson v Jamaica Buses, 172 AD2d 800).


Summaries of

Mackey v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 2009
67 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Mackey v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTINE MACKEY, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8790
888 N.Y.S.2d 774

Citing Cases

Tuckett v. Wavecrest Mgmt. Team Ltd.

Where common questions of law or fact exist, a motion to consolidate or for a joint trial pursuant to CPLR…

Tuckett v. Wavecrest Mgmt. Team Ltd.

Where common questions of law or fact exist, a motion to consolidate or for a joint trial pursuant to CPLR…