From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackenberg v. St. Charles Scrap Metal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 956 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 74903.

FILED: May 4, 1999.

APPEAL FROM: LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Thomas M. Kendrick, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Beverly E. Temple, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.

James A. Pudlowski, P.J., William H. Crandall Jr., J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.


ORDER


Francis Mackenberg, claimant, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant argues that the Commission's findings were not supported by substantial and competent evidence. He alleges that certain hospital bills were "reasonable and necessary and causally related to the injuries sustained" by claimant."

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The Commission's award was supported by substantial and competent evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mackenberg v. St. Charles Scrap Metal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 956 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Mackenberg v. St. Charles Scrap Metal

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS MACKENBERG, EMPLOYEE/APPELLANT, v. ST. CHARLES SCRAP METAL AND…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 4, 1999

Citations

989 S.W.2d 956 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)