From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackall v. U.S. Dep't of Def.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 8, 2018
No. 17-2435 (4th Cir. May. 8, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2435

05-08-2018

TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CLARK W. LEMASTERS, JR., Major General, U.S. Army, TACOM Commanding General; TIMOTHY D. LUEDECKING, Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Assistant, OUSD ATL; MYRON L. BELL, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army; MATTHEW D. TOBIN, Major, U.S. Army, Detailed Inspector General, Defendants - Appellees.

Toby Roberto Mackall, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00774-RDB) Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Toby Roberto Mackall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Toby Roberto Mackall appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mackall v. Dep't of Defense, No. 1:17-cv-00774-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mackall v. U.S. Dep't of Def.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 8, 2018
No. 17-2435 (4th Cir. May. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Mackall v. U.S. Dep't of Def.

Case Details

Full title:TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 8, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2435 (4th Cir. May. 8, 2018)