From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. Woodall

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 21, 2010
1:08CV753 (M.D.N.C. May. 21, 2010)

Opinion

1:08CV753.

May 21, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. #3] was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on October 28, 2008, was served on the parties in this action. On November 12, 2008, Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation. [Doc. # 6].

The court has now reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination that is in accord with the Recommendation. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation in full.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED suasponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation.


Summaries of

Mack v. Woodall

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 21, 2010
1:08CV753 (M.D.N.C. May. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Mack v. Woodall

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR., Plaintiff, v. JAMES R. WOODALL, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: May 21, 2010

Citations

1:08CV753 (M.D.N.C. May. 21, 2010)