From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1414 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1414 MCE GGH P.

September 19, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed July 13, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or a habeas petition or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Mack v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1414 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)
Case details for

Mack v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN B. MACK, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1414 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)