From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 26, 2021
312 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2078

02-26-2021

Jearick MACK Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jearick Mack, Jr., pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jearick Mack, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Johnson v. State , 297 So. 3d 638, 639–40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (affirming denial of motion to correct illegal sentence where sentencing transcript showed the trial court's clear intent to impose sentence under Prison Releasee Reoffender statute); State v. Harris , 129 So. 3d 1166, 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ("[W]hen the trial judge's oral pronouncement of a sentence is ambiguous, but the judge's intention is discernible from the record, the proper sentence is what the judge intended the sentence to be.").

Rowe, M.K. Thomas, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mack v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 26, 2021
312 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Mack v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEARICK MACK JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 26, 2021

Citations

312 So. 3d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)