From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. New York Yankees Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2010
69 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2074.

January 28, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered March 5, 2009, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Hodges, Walsh Slater, LLP, White Plains (Paul E. Svensson of counsel), for appellant.

Gordon Silber, P.C., New York (Andrew B. Kaufman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.


Defendant established prima facie entitlement to summary dismissal by submitting evidence that it had no notice of the condition on the stadium's escalator allegedly causing plaintiffs fall and that the escalator steps were reasonably safe for traversing, and plaintiffs opposition failed to create any material issue of fact. Although plaintiff alleged that water accumulated on the escalators each time it rained at Yankee Stadium, this raised no more than a general awareness that the escalators became wet during inclement weather, which was insufficient to establish constructive notice of the specific condition causing plaintiffs injury ( Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 6 NY3d 734). Plaintiff produced no evidence to raise a factual issue as to whether defendant had received such notice from any other source ( see Casado v OUB Houses Hous. Co. Inc., 59 AD3d 272).


Summaries of

Mack v. New York Yankees Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2010
69 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Mack v. New York Yankees Partnership

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MACK, Appellant, v. NEW YORK YANKEES PARTNERSHIP, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2010

Citations

69 A.D.3d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 586
894 N.Y.S.2d 395

Citing Cases

Perez v. Al-Stone LLC

In support of his argument that the Al-Stone defendants had constructive notice of the unprotected opening,…

Pastoriza v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Even assuming that there are questions about whether the intercom was functioning properly on June 19, 2006,…