From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 23, 2016
2:15-cv-02021-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)

Opinion

2:15-cv-02021-JAD-CWH

06-23-2016

LEROY ROOSEVELT MACK, Plaintiff, v. HONORABLE LLOYD D. GEORGE, Defendant.


REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

On March 1, 2016, the court entered an order (ECF No. 4) requiring Plaintiff Leroy Roosevelt Mack to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the $400 filing fee for a civil action. Plaintiff's deadline for filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee was March 31, 2016. (Order (ECF No. 4) at 2.) Plaintiff was explicitly warned that failure to comply with the court's order would result in a recommendation that his case be dismissed. (Id.) As of today's date, Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and has not paid the filing fee.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

NOTICE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this Report and Recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with this Report and Recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the District Court's Order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 23, 2016

/s/_________

C.W. Hoffman, Jr.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Mack v. George

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 23, 2016
2:15-cv-02021-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Mack v. George

Case Details

Full title:LEROY ROOSEVELT MACK, Plaintiff, v. HONORABLE LLOYD D. GEORGE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

2:15-cv-02021-JAD-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)