From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. Drew

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 3, 2013
520 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6026

05-03-2013

BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. DREW, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Warden for the Federal Correctional Institute at Bennettsville South Carolina; P. JENKINSON, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as case Manager at FCI Bennettsville South Carolina; MS. STONEBREAKER, in her individual capacity as Camp Counselor at FCI Bennettsville South Carolina; R. E. HOLT, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Regional Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons; YVONNE HINKSON, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendants - Appellees.

Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (9:09-cv-02891-JFA) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bennie Austin Mack, Jr. appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion for relief from the district court's judgment dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We previously affirmed the district court's orders dismissing the complaint and denying Mack's motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Mack v. Drew

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 3, 2013
520 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Mack v. Drew

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. DREW, in her…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 3, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2013)