From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maciel v. Stoddard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 7, 2010
Case No. 2:10-CV-00785-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-00785-LKK-KJN.

July 7, 2010


JUDGMENT ORDER


After review of the Stipulated Request for Judgment filed by Plaintiff and Defendants, and for good reason IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff.
2. Defendant will make the necessary changes to their place of business, STODDARD SATELLITE located in Weaverville, California, to make the business compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
3. Defendants collectively will pay Plaintiff the total sum of $8,000 inclusive of all costs of suit, all attorneys fees and all penalties (statutory or otherwise) in this matter. Plaintiff will not file any further or subsequent motions, pleadings or memoranda of any kind seeking to recover any further sums in this matter including any requests for attorneys fees, costs or penalties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maciel v. Stoddard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 7, 2010
Case No. 2:10-CV-00785-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Maciel v. Stoddard

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE MACIEL, Plaintiff, v. DANNY L. STODDARD and KAREN R. STODDARD, dba…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-00785-LKK-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)