From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macias v. Dep't of the Army

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 24, 2017
2016-2508 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 24, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2508

07-24-2017

MICHAEL L. MACIAS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

DAVID PAUL CLISHAM, Clisham & Sortor, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by JUSTINE LIV CLISHAM. RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-15-0385-I-2.

JUDGMENT

DAVID PAUL CLISHAM, Clisham & Sortor, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by JUSTINE LIV CLISHAM. RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 24, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Macias v. Dep't of the Army

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 24, 2017
2016-2508 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Macias v. Dep't of the Army

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. MACIAS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 2017

Citations

2016-2508 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 24, 2017)