From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Machowski v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2021
Case No.: SACV 20-02109-CJC (JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Case No.: SACV 20-02109-CJC (JDEx)

02-25-2021

AMBER MACHOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. LINDLEY-CROCKER ENTERPRISES and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff's application for default judgment. (Dkt. 17.) On February 25, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion in substantial part. In accordance with the Court's Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on her ADA claim. Defendant Lindley-Crocker Enterprises shall provide the required ADA-compliant parking, paths of travel, ramps, and signage, at Wholesale Nutrition located at 13962 Ponderosa Street in Santa Ana, California. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $3,841.85.

DATED: February 25, 2021

/s/_________

HON. CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Machowski v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2021
Case No.: SACV 20-02109-CJC (JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Machowski v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:AMBER MACHOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. LINDLEY-CROCKER ENTERPRISES and DOES 1-10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 25, 2021

Citations

Case No.: SACV 20-02109-CJC (JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2021)