From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Machesky v. Hawfield

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 26, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-9 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-9.

January 26, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25 day of January, 2010, after the Plaintiff, Brian Machesky, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [65] which the Chief Magistrate Judge, in a Report and Recommendation [82], concluded should be granted, and after the Plaintiff filed Objections [83], and after this Court conducted an independent review of the record, including the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [65] be GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, and these claims are, therefore, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, any appeal from this Order must be taken within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided Rule 3 of the Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Machesky v. Hawfield

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 26, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-9 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Machesky v. Hawfield

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN MACHESKY, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF HAWFIELD; LIEUTENANT BATES; WAYNESBURG…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 26, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-9 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 26, 2010)