Opinion
09-30-2016
In the Matter of Douglas C. MACHADO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Chandra V. TANOURY, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)
Koslosky & Koslosky, Utica (William L. Koslosky of Counsel), for petitioner-appellant. Cara A. Waldman, Fairport, for respondent-respondent. Michele E. Detraglia, Attorney for the Child, Utica.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered May 5, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
Koslosky & Koslosky, Utica (William L. Koslosky of Counsel), for petitioner-appellant.
Cara A. Waldman, Fairport, for respondent-respondent.
Michele E. Detraglia, Attorney for the Child, Utica.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Machado v. Tanoury (Appeal No. 1) 142 A.D.3d 1322, 38 N.Y.S.3d 356, 2016 WL 5512001 (Sept. 30, 2016).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, DeJOSEPH, and NEMOYER, JJ., concur.