From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Machado v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-570-OWW-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-570-OWW-MJS (PC)

09-20-2011

ALEX MACHADO, Plaintiff, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION to RE-OPEN


(ECF No. 14)

Plaintiff Alex Machado ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On June 28, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Consolidate, in which he sought to consolidate the above captioned matter with 10-cv-434-AWI-GSA. (ECF No. 12.) The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion on July 16, 2010. (ECF No. 13.)

On May 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Re-Open the above captioned matter. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has failed to sign his Motion to Re-Open, as he is required to under Local Rule 131. Local Rule 131 requires "[a]ll pleadings and non-evidentiary documents shall be signed by the individual attorney for the party presenting them, or by the party involved if that party is appearing in propria persona."

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Machado v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-570-OWW-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Machado v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:ALEX MACHADO, Plaintiff, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-570-OWW-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)