From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Machado v. Harrington

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2011
1:10-cv-00434-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)

Opinion

1:10-cv-00434-AWI-GSA-PC.

February 15, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW SUPPLEMENT (Doc. 31.) ORDER WITHDRAWING SUPPLEMENT FROM COURT'S DOCKET (Doc. 30.)


Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint initiating this action on May 11, 2010. (Doc. 1.) This action was dismissed on January 14, 2011. (Doc. 25.)

On February 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case. (Doc. 27.) On February 10, 2011, Plaintiff filed a supplement to the motion. (Doc. 30.) On February 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw the supplement. (Doc. 31.)

Good cause having been presented to the court, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his supplement is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff's supplement to the motion to reopen this case, filed on February 10, 2011, is WITHDRAWN from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2011


Summaries of

Machado v. Harrington

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2011
1:10-cv-00434-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Machado v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:ALEX MACHADO, Plaintiff, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

1:10-cv-00434-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)