From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MACE v. CARDONE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 163 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

April 5, 1962

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, BERNARD WEISS, J.

Rosenfeld Silverman ( Sidney B. Silverman of counsel), for appellant.

Bennett I. Schlessel for respondent.


The certificate of the notary public should have been received as presumptive evidence of the facts contained in such certificate. This evidence would have established a prima facie case calling upon the defendant to offer testimony in contradiction thereof. The refusal of the court to receive the document bearing the certificate in evidence was error.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

MACE v. CARDONE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 5, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 163 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

MACE v. CARDONE

Case Details

Full title:JACK MACE, Appellant, v. JULIA CARDONE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1962

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 163 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
232 N.Y.S.2d 279