Summary
finding that ALJ's failure to consider State agency consultants' opinions that claimant required a sit/stand option was harmless because other substantial evidence supported ALJ's finding of RFC without such an option
Summary of this case from Arrington v. ColvinOpinion
No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS
10-20-2011
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 22) filed September 29, 2011, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's Decision is AFFIRMED.
George Z. Singal
United States District Judge