From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacDougall v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 20, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2011)

Summary

finding that ALJ's failure to consider State agency consultants' opinions that claimant required a sit/stand option was harmless because other substantial evidence supported ALJ's finding of RFC without such an option

Summary of this case from Arrington v. Colvin

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS

10-20-2011

CAROL MacDOUGALL, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 22) filed September 29, 2011, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's Decision is AFFIRMED.

George Z. Singal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

MacDougall v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 20, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2011)

finding that ALJ's failure to consider State agency consultants' opinions that claimant required a sit/stand option was harmless because other substantial evidence supported ALJ's finding of RFC without such an option

Summary of this case from Arrington v. Colvin
Case details for

MacDougall v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CAROL MacDOUGALL, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Shorey v. Astrue

Id. at *5 (citations omitted). I adopted this reasoning in MacDougall v. Astrue, No. 2:10-cv-400-GZS, 2011 WL…

Lee v. Berryhill

See id. at 48, 60. As a practical matter, this translated to a need for a five-minute break, over and above…