From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacCormack v. State Department of Health

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1928
Jun 18, 1928
142 A. 477 (Conn. 1928)

Opinion

The issues in the present cases held determined adversely to the appellants by the decision in the case of Mower v. State Department of Health, ante, p. 74.

Argued April 17th, 1928

Decided June 18th, 1928.

APPEALS by the plaintiffs from the action of the State Department of Health in revoking their licenses to practice medicine, taken to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the court, Simpson, J.; judgments rendered dismissing the appeals, from which the plaintiffs appealed. No error in any appeal.

William F. D. Kilpatrick, for the appellants (plaintiffs MacCormack, Posner and Prisque). James W. Carpenter, with whom, on the brief, were Benjamin W. Alling, Attorney General, Cyril Coleman and J. H. Bartholomew, Jr., for the appellees (defendants).


Each of these appellants appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the revocation of his license to practice medicine by the State Department of Health under circumstances identical in all material respects with those involved in Mower v. State Department of Health, ante, p. 74. The issues raised are determined adversely to the appellants by our decision in that case.


Summaries of

MacCormack v. State Department of Health

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1928
Jun 18, 1928
142 A. 477 (Conn. 1928)
Case details for

MacCormack v. State Department of Health

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. MacCORMACK vs. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. SAMUEL POSNER…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, Bridgeport, April Term, 1928

Date published: Jun 18, 1928

Citations

142 A. 477 (Conn. 1928)
142 A. 477

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health

State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707. Proof of specific acts proper to prove "bad moral character." Mower v. State…