From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacCasland v. Mandara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 31, 1999
259 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 31, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J. — Damages.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court's distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of the parties' jointly owned residence is not supported by the stipulated facts submitted by the parties or by the record as a whole ( cf., Niemira v. Dean, 245 A.D.2d 1068, 1069; Matter of Bogert v. Rickard, 199 A.D.2d 587, 588). We conclude that each party is entitled to a proportionate share of the sale proceeds. After subtracting the amount necessary to pay off the mortgage, $68,774.02, and the closing costs, $7,306.96, the balance to be distributed is $18,919.02.

Each party's share of that amount depends on "the respective contributions of the: parties toward the acquisition of the property and the improvements made by each which contributed to the sale price" ( Mc Vicker v. Sarma, 163 A.D.2d 721, 722). The parties contributed a total of $34,953.35 toward the purchase, repair and improvement of the premises 74.39% of that amount was contributed by plaintiff ($22,000 down payment and $4,001.84 in repairs and improvements), and 25.61% of that amount was contributed by defendant ($1,473.73 down payment and $7,477.78 in repairs and improvements). Plaintiff's share of the net proceeds from' the sale is therefore $14,073.86 and defendant's share is $4,845.16.

Additionally, we conclude that defendant must reimburse plaintiff for one half of the costs' paid by plaintiff for the examinations before trial and court filing fees. Those costs total $432.50, and defendant must reimburse plaintiff $216.25.

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.


Summaries of

MacCasland v. Mandara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 31, 1999
259 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

MacCasland v. Mandara

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MacCASLAND, Appellant, v. ADAM MANDARA, Respondent. (Appeal No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Matter of Schroeder

Once the joint tenancy is severed, ownership of the property is transferred to a tenancy in common ( Matter…

Cytron v. Malinowitz

). Hence, "[a]n accounting is a necessary incident' of a partition action ( id. at 517), and may be had as a…