From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macaya v. Aramark, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Feb 28, 2022
No. 21-10052-CIV-MARTINEZ-REID (S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21-10052-CIV-MARTINEZ-REID

02-28-2022

YANDRI LOPEZ MACAYA, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, INC., et al., Defendants.


REID, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial proceedings. (ECF No. 5). Magistrate Judge Reid filed a Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 28), recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with this Court's Order Instructing pro se Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Quash Service and to Dismiss (the “Order”), (ECF No. 26). The Order was filed on December 14, 2021, and required that Plaintiff respond to the Motion to Quash Service, (ECF No. 25), on or before January 21, 2022. The time for Plaintiff to do so passed, and on January 31, 2022, Magistrate Judge Reid issued the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 28).

After waiting an additional month after Magistrate Judge Reid filed the Report and Recommendation for a response from Plaintiff, this Court notes that Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion to Quash Service, (ECF No. 26), nor objections to the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 28). Accordingly, after having reviewed the entire record and otherwise being advised of the premises, it is:

ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 28), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is: ADJUDGED that

1. Plaintiff s pro se Complaint, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. This case is CLOSED, and all pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Macaya v. Aramark, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Feb 28, 2022
No. 21-10052-CIV-MARTINEZ-REID (S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Macaya v. Aramark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:YANDRI LOPEZ MACAYA, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Feb 28, 2022

Citations

No. 21-10052-CIV-MARTINEZ-REID (S.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2022)