Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Mabwa v. Mendoza

19 N.E.3d 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Mabwa v. Mendoza

5 Citing cases

  1. N.M. Land v. The Dep't of Military Affairs

    2023 Ill. App. 4th 230219 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023)   Cited 1 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mabwa v. Mendoza, 2014 IL App (1st) 142771, ¶ 39, 19 N.E.3d 1252.

  2. Foley v. Godinez

    2016 Ill. App. 151814 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016)   Cited 8 times

    ”); Hadley v. Ryan, 345 Ill.App.3d 297, 301–02, 280 Ill.Dec. 818, 803 N.E.2d 48 (2003) (mandamus could not be used to compel attorney general to prosecute a claim where statute provides decision to prosecute was discretionary). “ ‘Mandamus cannot be used to direct a public official or body to reach a particular decision or to exercise its discretion in a particular manner, even if the judgment or discretion has been erroneously exercised.’ ” Mabwa v. Mendoza, 2014 IL App (1st) 142771, ¶ 36, 386 Ill.Dec. 99, 19 N.E.3d 1252 (quoting Crump v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board, 181 Ill.App.3d 58, 60, 129 Ill.Dec. 825, 536 N.E.2d 875 (1989) ). ¶ 23 Plaintiffs contend they are qualified retired law enforcement officers with a right to a concealed carry permit under LEOSA and, accordingly, the Director had a duty to certify their status as qualified retired law enforcement officers and was authorized to do so.

  3. Makula v. Victorine

    2021 Ill. App. 201298 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Instead, mandamus relief is "proper only when the acts compelled are 'purely ministerial' and 'require no exercise of judgment.' " Mabwa v. Mendoza, 2014 IL App (1st) 142771, ¶ 36 (quoting Baldacchino v. Thompson, 289 Ill. App. 3d 104, 109 (1997)). ¶ 15 As this court has previously noted, the relevant standard of review in mandamus cases is "unclear." Pate, 2019 IL App (1st) 190449, ¶ 27.

  4. Bd. of Educ. of Woodland Cmty. Consol. Sch. Dist. 50 v. Ill. State Charter Sch. Comm'n

    2016 Ill. App. 151372 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016)   Cited 15 times

    ]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mabwa v. Mendoza, 2014 IL App (1st) 142771, ¶ 36, 386 Ill.Dec. 99, 19 N.E.3d 1252. ¶ 44 The decision to renew a charter school's charter requires the Commission to exercise its discretion.

  5. Bd. of Educ. of Woodland Cmty. Consol. Sch. Dist. 50 v. Ill. State Charter Sch. Comm'n

    2015 Ill. App. 151372 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015)

    ]" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mabwa v. Mendoza, 2014 IL App (1st) 142771, ¶ 36. ¶ 45 The decision to renew a charter school's charter requires the Commission to exercise its discretion.