From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mabry v. Santos

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 13, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1581 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1581 WBS GGH P.

July 13, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's June 16, 2010, request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 30) is denied.


Summaries of

Mabry v. Santos

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 13, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1581 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Mabry v. Santos

Case Details

Full title:TONY MABRY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SANTOS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 13, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1581 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2010)