From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mabry v. Bowen

North Carolina Court of Appeals
May 1, 1972
188 S.E.2d 651 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 728SC302

Filed 24 May 1972

Parent and Child 2 — parental immunity — negligence — stepparent An unemancipated minor child is precluded by the doctrine of parental immunity from mainting [maintaining] an action against a stepparent standing in loco parentis for personal injuries negligently inflicted.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Tillery, Judge, 22 November 1971 Session of Superior Court held in LENOIR County.

Turner and Harrison by Fred W. Harrison for plaintiff appellant.

Whitaker, Jeffress Morris by Thomas H. Morris for defendant appellee.


Civil action to recover for personal injuries sustained by minor plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of defendant.

Defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that minor plaintiff, an unemancipated 12-year-old child, is defendant's stepchild, resides with defendant, and is totally supported by him. The motion was allowed and plaintiff appeals.


It has long been the rule in North Carolina that an unemancipated minor child cannot maintain an action against his parent for personal injuries negligently inflicted. Watson v. Nichols, 270 N.C. 733, 155 S.E.2d 154; Small v. Morrison, 185 N.C. 577, 118 S.E. 12; Evans v. Evans, 12 N.C. App. 17, 182 S.E.2d 227, cert. den. 279 N.C. 394, 183 S.E.2d 242.

Plaintiff candidly concedes the existence of the rule and agrees that it extends to a stepparent standing in loco parentis, which is the case here. She argues, however, that the time has come for North Carolina to join the growing list of states abandoning the parental immunity rule.

In answering a similar contention in the case of Evans v. Evans, supra, Judge Parker noted that it is for our Legislature or the Supreme Court to determine whether parental immunity in North Carolina should be abolished. Plaintiff's logic and arguments are persuasive. However, this Court does not have the authority to overrule decisions of the Supreme Court. Lehrer v. Manufacturing Co., 13 N.C. App. 412, 185 S.E.2d 727.

Affirmed.

Judges MORRIS and VAUGHN concur.


Summaries of

Mabry v. Bowen

North Carolina Court of Appeals
May 1, 1972
188 S.E.2d 651 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Mabry v. Bowen

Case Details

Full title:MYRA JEAN MABRY, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, LELA H. BOWEN v…

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: May 1, 1972

Citations

188 S.E.2d 651 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972)
188 S.E.2d 651

Citing Cases

Triplett v. Triplett

Plaintiff's sole contention on appeal is that this Court should retroactively abrogate the doctrine of…

Morgan v. Johnson

"It has long been the rule in North Carolina that an unemancipated minor child cannot maintain an action…