Opinion
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff M/A-COM Technology Solutions Inc. ("plaintiff" or "MACOM") and defendants Steven L. Collins and Integrated Semiconductor Service, Inc. (collectively "defendants") as follows:
Whereas on June 5, 2015, this Court issued an Order (Doc. No. 19), granting in part plaintiff's ex parte motion for temporary restraining order;
Whereas the Court's June 5, 2015 Order set a hearing for June 29, 2015 for an order to to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue against defendants;
Andrew P. Holland, Mark V. Boennighausen, Jared M. Ahern, THOITS LAW, A Professional Corporation, Los Altos, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff M/A-COM Technology Solutions Inc.
GOINS & ASSOCIATES, Vernon C. Goins, Attorneys for Defendant Steven L. Collins.
Whereas the Court set the deadline for defendants' opposition to said motion to be due on June 15, 2015 and plaintiff's reply to be due on June 22, 2015;
Whereas since June 5, 2015, plaintiff has made attempts but has been unsuccessful in locating Mr. Collins and effecting service on him;
Whereas on June 15, 2015, counsel for Mr. Collins, Vernon C. Goins, contacted MACOM's counsel and stated he would now be representing Mr. Collins in this case;
Whereas Mr. Goins requested that the June 29, 2015 hearing be continued to a later date so as to allow time to file a response on behalf of Mr. Collins;
Whereas Mr. Goins has accepted service of the complaint and the court's June 5, 2015 Order by e-mail on behalf of Mr. Collins;
Whereas Mr. Goins has agreed to produce Mr. Collins for deposition on June 19, 2015 at 400 Main Street, Suite 250, Los Altos, California;
Whereas, plaintiff and defendants agree to continue the June 29, 2015 hearing to July 17, 2015 or the first available date thereafter to be set by the Court;
Whereas, plaintiff and defendant agree that defendants' opposition to said motion will be due two weeks (14 calendar days) prior to the new hearing date and plaintiff's reply will be due one week (7 calendar days) prior to the new hearing date;
Whereas, plaintiff and defendants agree that the Court's June 5, 2015 Order shall remain in effect up to and including the continued hearing date.
IT IS SO STIPLATED.
Pursuant to the terms of the parties' stipulation, the Court orders that the June 29, 2015 hearing is continued until July 17, 2015 at 2:00 pm.. The briefing schedule shall be as stipulated by the parties. The Court's June 5, 2015 order shall remain in effect until a further order of this Court on MACOM's request for a preliminary injunction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.