From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M. E. R. v. L. B. R.

Family Court of the State of Delaware
Nov 19, 2018
File No.: CN17-03721 (Del. Fam. Nov. 19, 2018)

Opinion

File No.: CN17-03721 Petition No.: 17-17694

11-19-2018

Re: M. E. R. v. L. B. R.


Kathryn Laffey, Esquire
Kelleher & Laffey
1509 Gilpin Avenue
Wilmington, DE 19806 Jennifer K. Ellsworth-Aults, Esquire
Poole, Mensinger, Cutrona & Ellsworth-Aults
2710 Centerville Road, Suite 101
Wilmington, DE 19808

LETTER DECISION AND ORDER

Petition Type: Ancillary Dear Counsel:

The Court held a hearing on Ancillary Matters to the parties' divorce on September 6 and 7, 2018 and issued an Ancillary Decision and Order on November 19, 2018. Both parties filed for Reargumet. This is the Court's Order on the Motions for Reargument which are granted in Part.

BALANCE OF MORTGAGE ON MARITAL HOME

Wife alleges in her Motion for Reargument that the Court used the date of hearing value for the Highway mortgage for the date of hearing balance on the mortgage against the marital home. The Court notes that initially the parties Stipulated at the outset of the case to the current balance of $323,425.00 for both of these mortgages. At some point later in the proceeding, the parties corrected the balance of the mortgage on the highway to $330,925.00. The Court inadvertently changed the current balance on the marital home instead of the Highway property. Therefore, this request is appropriate and will be granted.

The Court notes that this balance was original provided as $331,532.00 and corrected.

BALANCE OF MORTGAGES ON HIGHWAY

The parties read into the record that the balance of the first mortgage on the Highway property at the time Wife moved out of the marital home was $348,005.88 and that the balance of the loan to Husband's stepfather was $106,280.00 as of this same date. The Court understood Husband's position to be to use the July, 2017 balances as these were the amounts read into the record at the outset of the hearing. The Court would use the July, 2017 date as this was the date that the parties separated into two separate households. The amortization schedule for the personal loan was not entered into evidence. There was testimony through Husband's Mother regarding the current balance and the dispute that was argued was regarding using a current balance of $98,247.00 versus the date of separation. However, since the amount suggested by Wife actually benefits Husband, the Court will accept the amount proposed by Wife of $107,310.00.

OTHER ISSUES

Husband argues that the Court erred in not diving the smaller promissory note and in using the NADA values for the vehicles. The Court finds that these arguments are not appropriate for reargument as Husband is simply not happy with the Court's rulings on these issues. There is no allegation that the Court overlooked a precedent or legal principle or that the misapprehended the law or facts.

In Re Marriage of Silverstein, 1997 WL 905948, Del. Fam. --------

ORDER

The November 19, 2018 Order is amended as follows:

1. The balance of the mortgage against the marital home at Drive is $323,425.00.

2. The balance of the first promissory loan to Husband's Stepfather is $107,310.00.

3. The equalization payment in paragraph 8 of the November 19, 2018 Order is amended to $104,868.00 according to the attached charts. This amount shall be paid within 90 days.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of DECEMBER, 2018.

Very truly yours,

Felice Glennon Kerr, Judge FGK:vm Date emailed: 12-17-18
Date mailed: 12-17-18 Division of Marital Property Property division report for M R and L R

MAmount

LAmount

TotalAmount

Real Estate Equity

$31,575

$0

$31,575

Total Value $355,000

1st Mortgage $323,425

Marital Equity $31,575

Highway

$184,685

$0

$184,685

Total Value $640,000

1st Mortgage $348,005

2nd Mortgage $107,310

Marital Equity $184,685

Total Real Estate Equity

$216,260

$0

$216,260

Cash & Investments

(H) M & T X

$743

$0

$743

(W) M & T X

$0

$62

$62

(H) Capital One x

$1,225

$0

$1,225

(W) Capital One x

$0

$1,310

$1,310

(H) WSFS x

$1,534

$0

$1,534

(W) M & T x

$0

$2,187

$2,187

(W) Capital One x

$0

$2,686

$2,686

(W) Capital One x

$0

$4,023

$4,023

(W) Capital One x

$0

$234

$234

Total Investments

$3,502

$10,502

$14,004

Cars and Personal Effects

Mercedes 2010

$0

$11,602

$11,602

1994 Jeep Cherokee

$1,675

$0

$1,675

2003 Ford F350

$8,430

$0

$8,430

1999 Jeep

$1,973

$0

$1,973

--

--

$0

--

--

$0

Total Personal Items

$12,078

$11,602

$23,680

Subtotal Non-Retirement

$231,840

$22,104

$253,944

Subtotal Retirement

$0

$0

$0

Total Assets

$231,840

$22,104

$253,944

Debts

Debt #1

$0

$0

$0

Debt #2

$0

$0

$0

Debt #3

--

--

$0

Debt #4

--

--

$0

Total Debt

$0

$0

$0

Property division report for M R and L R

MAmount

LAmount

TotalAmount

Total Debts

$0

$0

$0

Total Assets

$231,840

$22,104

$253,944

Total Debts

$0

$0

$0

Total Marital Property

$231,840

$22,104

$253,944

Note: "Total Amount" column may not add due to rounding.

Image materials not available for display.


Summaries of

M. E. R. v. L. B. R.

Family Court of the State of Delaware
Nov 19, 2018
File No.: CN17-03721 (Del. Fam. Nov. 19, 2018)
Case details for

M. E. R. v. L. B. R.

Case Details

Full title:Re: M. E. R. v. L. B. R.

Court:Family Court of the State of Delaware

Date published: Nov 19, 2018

Citations

File No.: CN17-03721 (Del. Fam. Nov. 19, 2018)