From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lytle v. Rosemere Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n, Non-Profit Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 21, 2015
No. 60657 (Nev. Dec. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 60657 No. 61308

12-21-2015

JOHN ALLEN LYTLE AND TRUDI LEE LYTLE, AS TRUSTEES OF THE LYTLE TRUST, Appellants, v. ROSEMERE ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER VACATING AND REMANDING

These are consolidated appeals from a district court final judgment in a real property and declaratory relief action (Docket No. 60657) and a post-judgment award of attorney fees (Docket No. 61308). Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

Having considered the record, we conclude that the Lytles' actions during the NRED arbitration were sufficient to "submit" their slander of title claim to the NRED arbitrator for purposes of NRS 38.330(5). We also conclude that the Lytles did not need to establish that they suffered monetary damages for their remaining claims to be viable. Accordingly, we vacate the district court's summary judgment.

We have considered Rosemere's alternative arguments as to why the Lytles' claims fail on their merits. Based on the current record, we are unable to determine that all aspects of the Lytles' claims would fail as a matter of law.

In light of our conclusion that summary judgment was improperly granted, we vacate the district court's June 5, 2012, order awarding attorney fees, costs, and damages to Rosemere, as Rosemere at this point is not the prevailing party. For the same reasons, we vacate the district court's August 13, 2012, order awarding supplemental attorney fees that the Lytles are challenging in Docket No. 61308.

Consistent with the foregoing, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

To the extent that our resolution of these appeals may appear inconsistent with our resolution of the appeal in Docket No. 63942, we note that our resolution of these appeals was premised in part on the Lytles' stipulation as to the amended CC&Rs' validity. --------

/s/_________, J.

Saitta

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Pickering cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge

Sterling Law, LLC

Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Lytle v. Rosemere Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n, Non-Profit Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 21, 2015
No. 60657 (Nev. Dec. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Lytle v. Rosemere Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n, Non-Profit Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ALLEN LYTLE AND TRUDI LEE LYTLE, AS TRUSTEES OF THE LYTLE TRUST…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 21, 2015

Citations

No. 60657 (Nev. Dec. 21, 2015)