Lytle v. Lytle

2 Citing cases

  1. Weber v. Weber

    Case No. 01CA7 (Ohio Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2001)   Cited 2 times

    (Emphasis added.) See, also, McPherson v. McPherson (1950), 153 Ohio St. 82; Lytle v. Lytle (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 697, 702; Jones v. Brister (Aug. 6, 2001), Lawrence App. No. 00CA44, citing Hamilton v. Hamilton (1995), 107 Ohio App.3d 132, 139. In Lytle v. Lytle, the original court order for child support of a non-custodial father's four children ordered support on a per-child basis.

  2. Day v. Bloom

    2006 Ohio 6957 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)

    In order for the parents' agreement altering child support to have any legal effect, the parents need to seek court approval of their agreement and the agreement must comport with the Child Support Guidelines and the standards set forth in Marker v. Grimm (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 139. See Lytle v. Lytle (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 697, 703; Nelson, 65 Ohio App.3d at 805. DePalmo v. DePalmo (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 535, 540.