From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lytle v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 5, 1973
285 So. 2d 293 (La. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 4282.

November 5, 1973.

John E. Adkins, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane and Donohoe, by Lawrence L. Lewis, III, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee, Liberty Mutual.

J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for Intervenor-appellee.

Champagne Colomb, by Patrick L. Colomb, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee, Home Indemnity.

P. A. Bienvenu, New Orleans, for Pugh Boudreaux, by Charles J. Boudreaux, Lafayette; Bailey Hollier, by W. C. Hollier, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGE, SAVOY, and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.


For the reasons assigned in the case of D. L. Lytle, Sr. v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, 258 So.2d 289 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1973), the judgment of the District Court dismissing the suit of D. L. Lytle, Sr., against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Gulf Coast Line Contracting Company, Rex Angelle, Central Louisiana Electric Company, Home Indemnity Company of New York, and Smith-Foreman Pipeline Contracting Company is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for trial.

It is further ordered that, that part of the judgment dismissing the demands of third-party plaintiffs against third-party defendants is reversed, and the suits are remanded to the District Court for trial on the merits.

It is further ordered that, that part of the judgment in favor of intervenor, J. Minos Simon, and against D. L. Lytle, Sr., in the sum of $2,416.66, together with legal interest and recognizing the privilege of J. Minos Simon as to any proceeds due and owing D. L. Lytle in this suit is hereby affirmed.

It is further ordered that all sums deposited in the registry of the District Court shall be retained by the court until judgment on the merits is rendered or a written compromise is effected. The sum of $7,250.00 shall bear no legal interest. In the event judgment in excess of this amount is rendered, only that portion in excess shall bear legal interest.

Defendants-appellees are assessed costs of this appeal.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part; and remanded.


Summaries of

Lytle v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Nov 5, 1973
285 So. 2d 293 (La. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Lytle v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:D. L. LYTLE, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 5, 1973

Citations

285 So. 2d 293 (La. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

St. Amand v. Marriott Hotel, Inc.

Article 3071 has been consistently applied in the Louisiana cases. Charbonnet v. Ochsner, 1971, 258 La. 507,…

Southern Shipbuilding Corp. v. Richardson

Plaintiff at trial presented expert testimony indicating that the customary fee in actions for personal…