From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lytle v. Baum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Jun 2, 2016
2:16-CV-00015-SAB (E.D. Wash. Jun. 2, 2016)

Opinion

2:16-CV-00015-SAB

06-02-2016

PATRICK ROBERT LYTLE, Plaintiff, v. S. BAUM, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO KEEP COURT INFORMED OF ADDRESS

Magistrate Judge Rodgers filed a Report and Recommendation on May 10, 2016, recommending Mr. Lytle's action be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff had failed to keep the Court informed of his change of address and had failed to comply with the directive to amend or voluntarily dismiss.

There being no objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to keep the Clerk of Court informed of Plaintiff's current address. // // //

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, forward a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address and close the file. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in law or fact.

DATED this 2nd day of June 2016.

/s/_________

Stanley A. Bastian

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lytle v. Baum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Jun 2, 2016
2:16-CV-00015-SAB (E.D. Wash. Jun. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Lytle v. Baum

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK ROBERT LYTLE, Plaintiff, v. S. BAUM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Jun 2, 2016

Citations

2:16-CV-00015-SAB (E.D. Wash. Jun. 2, 2016)