From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 1994
650 A.2d 183 (D.C. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 89-CF-250, 89-CF-299.

October 31, 1994.

Before: WAGNER, Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, and SULLIVAN, Associate Judges.

Judge Wagner was an Associate Judge of this court at the time of argument. Her status changed to Chief Judge on June 14, 1994.

Associate Judge Farrell has recused himself from these cases.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's motion for resumption of proceedings en banc, appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, and the responses thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of July 28, 1994, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 30 days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Lyons v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 1994
650 A.2d 183 (D.C. 1994)
Case details for

Lyons v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Richard LYONS, Appellant, Pamela K. Cooper, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 31, 1994

Citations

650 A.2d 183 (D.C. 1994)

Citing Cases

Lyons v. U.S.

The government once again sought rehearing en banc, which was granted. Lyons v. United States, 650 A.2d 183…