From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. Arkansas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 1, 2015
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00091 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00091 BSM/BD

10-01-2015

CHANDRA LYONS, ADC #704518 PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, et al. DEFENDANTS


RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

I. Procedures for Filing Objections:

This Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to Chief Judge Brian S. Miller. You may file written objections to this Recommendation. If you file objections, they must be specific and must include the factual or legal basis for your objection.

Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk within fourteen (14) days of this Recommendation.

If no objections are filed, Judge Miller can adopt this Recommendation without independently reviewing the record. By not objecting, you may also waive any right to appeal questions of fact. II. Discussion:

On August 21, 2015, Plaintiff Chandra Lyons, an Arkansas Department of Correction ("ADC") inmate, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Docket entry #1) Because of her litigation history, Ms. Lyons is not eligible for in forma pauperis status in federal court absent an allegation that she is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Here, Ms. Lyons did not plead facts alleging that she was in imminent danger of serious physical injury. (#1, #4, #8)

The following dismissals constitute "strikes" against Ms. Lyons for purposes of determining eligibility for IFP status: Lyons et al. v. McDonald et al., E.D. Ark. Case No. 5:96cv00369 (dismissed March 31, 1997); Lyons v. Anderson, E.D. Ark. Case No. 5:96cv00463 (dismissed November 19, 1996); Lyons v. Thompson, E.D. Ark. Case No. 5:96cv00547 (dismissed January 22, 1997). --------

The Court allowed Ms. Lyons thirty days to pay the $400 filing fee in order to proceed with this lawsuit and specifically cautioned her that if she did not pay the filing fee, her claims could be dismissed, without prejudice. (#3) To date, Ms. Lyons has not paid the filing fee, as required in the Court's August 25, 2015 Order, and the time for doing so has passed. III. Conclusion:

The Court recommends that Ms. Lyons's claims be DISMISSED, without prejudice based on her failure to comply with the Court's August 25, 2015 Order requiring her to pay the filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 1st day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lyons v. Arkansas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Oct 1, 2015
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00091 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Lyons v. Arkansas

Case Details

Full title:CHANDRA LYONS, ADC #704518 PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00091 BSM/BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2015)