From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynnebrook Woodbrook v. Borough of Millersville

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 1999
738 A.2d 993 (Pa. 1999)

Opinion

March 29, 1999.

Petition No. 756 M.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1996 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

David E. Wagenseller, III, Lancaster, for petitioner.


Prior report: Pa.Comwlth., 687 A.2d 76.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:

Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else's property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.


Summaries of

Lynnebrook Woodbrook v. Borough of Millersville

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 1999
738 A.2d 993 (Pa. 1999)
Case details for

Lynnebrook Woodbrook v. Borough of Millersville

Case Details

Full title:LYNNEBROOK WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates v. BOROUGH OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 1999

Citations

738 A.2d 993 (Pa. 1999)
738 A.2d 993