Lynn v. State

Full title: SEAN CAREY LYNN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

No. 10-08-00144-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. 10-08-00144-CR

Opinion delivered and filed March 25, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas, Trial Court No. 32417CR. Affirmed.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice REYNA, and Justice DAVIS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

Sean Carey Lynn was convicted of Failure to Register as a Sex Offender and sentenced to 12 years in prison. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 62.102 (Vernon 2006). We affirm. In his sole issue, Lynn contends the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. He relies solely on the "reasonable hypothesis analytical construct" as support for why the evidence was insufficient. That construct for determining the sufficiency of the evidence was abrogated by the Court of Criminal Appeals in 1991. Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154, 159, 161 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). Because Lynn argues no other reason in support of his issue that the evidence is insufficient, his issue is overruled. Accordingly, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.