From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynn v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00136-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00136-WJM-BNB

09-16-2011

RICHARD J. LYNN, Plaintiff, v. W. COX, SIS Investigator, J. BOLEY, Unit Manager, J. CAREY, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, R. SHANK, Staff Representative, R. WILEY, Warden, ADX, B. DAVIS, Warden, ADX, J. FOX, Associate Warden, ADX, J. JONES, Associate Warden, ADX, M. COLLINS, Unit Manager, ADX, P. RANGEL, Unit Manager, ADX, A. FENLON, Case Manager, T. JOHNS, Warden USP-1 Coleman, FL, R. BURTON, Associate Warden, USP-1 Coleman, FL, and O. BARAT, Captain, USP-1 Coleman, FL, Defendants.


Judge William J. Martinez


ORDER ON MOTION FOR ORDER TO CORRECT THE RECORD

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Correct the Record, ECF No. 30, filed on September 9, 2011. Plaintiff requests the Court clarify whether Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. To the extent conflicting orders have been issued, the Court herein wishes to correct the record.

In Plaintiff's Motion, he correctly states that on July 15, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but that on August 26, 2011, Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel was denied because "[t]he plaintiff is not proceeding

in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915." (ECF No. 30; see also Order Granting Service, ECF No. 16; Order Denying Mtn. to Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 29 at n.1.)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a prisoner may be granted leave by the court to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil action when not able to afford the initial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. In the instant case, Plaintiff payed the court's $350 filing fee on the same date as he filed the Complaint, indicating to the Court that he did not intend to proceed in forma pauperis.

In its Order Granting Service, the Court erroneously granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Correct the Record, ECF No. 30. The Court ORDERS as follows:

1) That portion of the Order Granting Service granting Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No 16, be RESCINDED; and
2) The Clerk shall send to Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis so that an accurate determination may be made by the United States Magistrate Judge.

BY THE COURT:

William J. Martinez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lynn v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00136-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Lynn v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. LYNN, Plaintiff, v. W. COX, SIS Investigator, J. BOLEY, Unit…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00136-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)