Opinion
2:23-cv-00572-RSM
12-07-2023
CHELSY LYNCH, a Washington Resident, Plaintiff, v. SUTTELL & HAMMER, PS, a Washington corporation and licensed collection agency, Defendant.
WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN LLP Withdrawing Attorneys for Defendant Suttell & Hammer, PS Nohl C. Speck, Timothy John Repass, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Substituting Attorney for Defendant Suttell & Hammer, PS Brad Fisher, Attorney for Plaintiff Chelsy Lynch Peter Schneider
WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN LLP
Withdrawing Attorneys for Defendant Suttell & Hammer, PS
Nohl C. Speck,
Timothy John Repass,
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Substituting Attorney for Defendant
Suttell & Hammer, PS
Brad Fisher,
Attorney for Plaintiff Chelsy Lynch
Peter Schneider
STIPULATED MOTION AND
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO
WITHDRAW AND FOR
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION
Pursuant to LCR 83.2(b)(1) and (2), Plaintiff Chelsy Lynch (“Plaintiff”) and Suttell & Hammer, PS (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to and request the Court's approval of a substitution of counsel for Defendant. Nohl C. Speck and Timothy John Repass of the law firm Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP are withdrawing as counsel for Defendant, and for Brad Fisher of the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is substituting as counsel of record for Defendant.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Nohl C. Speck and Timothy John Repass of the law firm Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP may withdraw as counsel for Defendant Suttell & Hammer, PS; and
2. Brad Fisher of the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is substituted as counsel of record for Defendant Suttell & Hammer, PS in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.