From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LYNCH v. LI

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 13, 2010
No C 10-2009 VRW, No C 09-3622 VRW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2010)

Opinion

No C 10-2009 VRW, No C 09-3622 VRW.

September 13, 2010


ORDER


On August 24, 2010 the court ordered Xin Xin "Annie" Li to show cause why judgment should not be entered against her in the above-captioned cases. Doc #15. In its order, the court made clear that failure to respond would be considered grounds on which to enter judgment in favor of Merrill Lynch in the both cases. Id. Li has not filed a response to the court's order and the deadline for doing so has passed. Accordingly, the clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in cases 09-cv-3622 VRW and 10-cv-2009 in favor of MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH INCORPORATED, to terminate all motions, to vacate all hearings and to close the files.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LYNCH v. LI

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 13, 2010
No C 10-2009 VRW, No C 09-3622 VRW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2010)
Case details for

LYNCH v. LI

Case Details

Full title:MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. XIN XIN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 13, 2010

Citations

No C 10-2009 VRW, No C 09-3622 VRW (N.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2010)