From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynch v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 19, 2001
285 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: July 19, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Ronald Lynch, Malone, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a prison disciplinary hearing stemming from two misbehavior reports, petitioner was found guilty of interference with an employee, harassment, possession of a contraband which could be classified as a weapon, refusing a direct order, failure to comply with a search order, tampering with property and two counts of making threats. According to the first misbehavior report, petitioner became loud and boisterous and threatened a correction officer as she was sweeping the gallery during a lock down at the correctional facility. When the correction officer reported the incident, a search of petitioner's cell was ordered. Thereafter, a second misbehavior report was issued when petitioner continued his threats and refused orders that he vacate his cell in order for the search to be conducted. In the course of the search, an altered razor was found with the safety casing removed, which, according to testimony from various correction officers, renders the item a weapon. The details of the two misbehavior reports, together with the corroborating testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Petitioner's contrary version of the events, which was corroborated by two inmate witnesses, presented a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against him (see, Matter of Barnes v. Goord, 279 A.D.2d 685).

Petitioner's remaining contentions of Hearing Officer bias and excessive penalty have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Lynch v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 19, 2001
285 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Lynch v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RONALD LYNCH, PETITIONER, v. GLENN GOORD, AS COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 19, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 805

Citing Cases

Vann v. Goord

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from possessing…

In the Matter of Valentine v. Goord

Petitioner's conduct caused a delay in the completion of the tier II hearing. The misbehavior report,…