From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynch v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01120-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01120-REB-MEH

10-03-2011

NICK LYNCH, Plaintiff, v. ADAM BARRETT, STEPHEN KENFIELD, MICHAEL MORELOCK, ABBEGAYLE DORN, and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on October 3, 2011.

Plaintiff's Uncontested Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [filed September 30, 2011; docket #26] is denied. The deadlines and conference dates currently scheduled in this case were selected based upon, and to comply with, the trial preparation and trial dates set by the District Court. In addition, the order granting in part the requested stay took into consideration the scheduled trial dates. Unless such trial dates are amended, this Court may not adjust the pretrial deadlines and conference dates as scheduled.


Summaries of

Lynch v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01120-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Lynch v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:NICK LYNCH, Plaintiff, v. ADAM BARRETT, STEPHEN KENFIELD, MICHAEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01120-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 3, 2011)