From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynch v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 27, 2010
Civil No. 09-6170-PK (D. Or. Aug. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-6170-PK.

August 27, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [19] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that a judgment be entered affirming the Commissioner's decision. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation and the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [19] is adopted and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lynch v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 27, 2010
Civil No. 09-6170-PK (D. Or. Aug. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Lynch v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BROGAN T. LYNCH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 27, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-6170-PK (D. Or. Aug. 27, 2010)