From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyles v. Dist. Attorney of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1605 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1605

11-30-2012

CHARLES LYLES [HQ8920] v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2013, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1).
3. Petitioner's objections are overruled.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Edmund V. Ludwig, J.


Summaries of

Lyles v. Dist. Attorney of Phila.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1605 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Lyles v. Dist. Attorney of Phila.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LYLES [HQ8920] v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-1605 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2012)