Summary
explaining that " purposeful direction analysis is most often used in suits sounding in tort, such as fraud"
Summary of this case from Chassin Holdings Corp. v. Formula VC Ltd.Opinion
Case No. CIV-F-03-5502 OWW/TAG.
March 8, 2006
Roger K. Vehrs, Attorney at Law, Fresno, California, Attorney for Plaintiff JOHN LYDDON.
ORDER AFTER HEARING
The above matter came on regularly for hearing on February 27, 2006, before the Honorable Oliver W. Wanger. Plaintiff John Lyddon was present and represented by his attorney Roger K. Vehrs. Attorney Diana Griffiths was present representing the defendants Alfonso Rocha-Albertsen and Hilario Alonso Cuellar-Abundiz.
The court after hearing evidence and arguments of counsel makes the following orders.
ORDER
1. That the trial of this matter is set for May 2, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3.
2. The pre-trial conference will be held on March 27, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3.
3. The summary judgment motions that have been previously filed will be heard as a motion in limine. Motions in limine must be filed by April 4, 2006. Objections and oppositions to motions in limine are to be filed by April 14, 2006. The hearing on the motions in limine shall be heard on April 21, 2006 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3.
4. The court further enters an evidentiary sanction as to the billing and time records that were not produced as ordered by Judge Teresa Goldner and thus those documents cannot be used or referred to in any way by the defendants in this case.
5. Finally, the court orders that the defendant Hilario Alonso Cuellar Abundiz is ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,000 which are to be paid today.
IT IS SO ORDERED.