Opinion
March, 1922.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Determination affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the transaction did not constitute a loan of money, upon which alone usury can be predicated.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Luzzatto v. Kaplan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1922
201 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Summaries of
Luzzatto v. Kaplan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1922
201 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for
Luzzatto v. Kaplan
Case Details
Full title:LAZARUS LUZZATTO, Respondent, v. HARRY KAPLAN, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1922
Citations
201 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Citing Cases
In re Bibbey
" Smith v. Kaufman, 145 Ark. 548, 224 S.W. 978. See, also, Blake v. Askew, 112 Ark. 514, 166 S.W. 965;…