From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. Enuff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 24, 2018
Civil No: 16-05847 (RBK-KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No: 16-05847 (RBK-KMW)

10-24-2018

Luxottica Group S.P.A., Plaintiff v. Shore Enuff, et al., Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

ROBERT B. KUGLER, District Judge

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Karen M. Williams, United States Magistrate Judge, filed on 24 September 2018 (ECF Doc. No. 89) ["this Report"] regarding Plaintiff's, Luxottica Group, motion to strike Defendants', Shore Enuff, Answers, and for Default Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 83) ["the Motion"]; and

THE COURT having received no objections pursuant to L. Civ. R. 72.1(c)(2) and having reviewed this Report and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Report be ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court, and accordingly

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

the Motion be GRANTED, Defendants' Answers STRUCK and Default Judgment ENTERED.

The Clerk is instructed to terminate this case. Date: 24 October 2018

s/ Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. Enuff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 24, 2018
Civil No: 16-05847 (RBK-KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. Enuff

Case Details

Full title:Luxottica Group S.P.A., Plaintiff v. Shore Enuff, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 24, 2018

Citations

Civil No: 16-05847 (RBK-KMW) (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2018)